Documentation · 2024 – 2026

Reports & Publications

Accountable documentation of our community-led work: frontier technology infrastructure across the Turkana–Karamoja–South Omo corridor, and peer-led digital safety education for refugee women and girls in border communities.

2Published reports
77People trained
6Border regions
MayHem Threads field reports and documentation
Report Library

Published Field Reports

Download the full PDFs or read the structured summaries below.

Report 01 · Project Report 2024–2026

Cross-Border Liaison Tech Network

Mayhem Threads Technology & Innovation Collective · Implementation Period 2024–2025
Regions: East Africa, Horn of Africa & Great Lakes

Download Full Report (PDF)

Network at a Glance

Headline figures from the 18-month implementation period.

32
Community liaisons trained
40+
Cross-border events
3
Countries connected
12
Local network nodes
0
Data breaches or leaks
1. Executive Summary & 2. Rationale

Built for Frontier Realities, Not Capital Cities

Between 2024 and 2026, Mayhem Threads implemented the Cross-Border Liaison Tech Network, a pioneering initiative designed to strengthen digital connectivity, information sharing, and collaborative problem-solving across porous borders in the East African region. The project established a decentralized, secure communication infrastructure linking grassroots organisations, community-based networks, and civil society actors operating in cross-border corridors of Turkana (Kenya), Karamoja (Uganda), and South Omo (Ethiopia).

The network trained 32 community liaisons — predominantly young women and youth from pastoralist, nomadic, and stateless communities — in the deployment and management of low-bandwidth, offline-first digital tools. These tools enabled real-time coordination on drought response, livestock disease tracking, conflict mediation, and human rights monitoring, all while preserving data sovereignty and community control.

Unlike conventional cross-border projects that rely on centralized, cloud-dependent platforms operating from capital cities, the Liaison Tech Network was designed for intermittent electricity, minimal internet access, multilingual communication, and high mobility. All data routing, storage, and decision-making remained under local governance, with community-elected tech stewards managing network nodes.

Community tech stewards in the border corridor
Section 3

Objectives

Six commitments that framed the network’s design and evaluation.

1

Build cross-border digital coordination capacity

Among grassroots organisations and community networks operating in the Turkana–Karamoja–South Omo corridor.

2

Deploy offline-first, low-bandwidth infrastructure

Functioning without reliable internet or electricity, using mesh networking, peer-to-peer sync, and solar-powered local servers.

3

Train community tech stewards

With priority given to young women and youth from pastoralist and stateless backgrounds, to install, maintain, and govern network nodes.

4

Establish data sovereignty protocols

Ensuring all information shared across the network remains under local control, with explicit consent governing any external access.

5

Test horizontal versus centralized systems

Whether community-governed tech networks can outperform top-down systems in speed, trust, and relevance for cross-border crisis response.

6

Document replicable models

Cross-border liaison tech models that can be adapted by other frontier communities across the African continent.

Section 4

Approach & Methods

Participatory action research and infrastructure deployment — every aspect co-designed with community members, not imposed upon them.

4.1 Network Architecture & Design

Built on three core principles: offline-first operation, horizontal peer-to-peer communication, and community node governance. A distributed mesh topology let each hub communicate directly with neighbouring hubs, passing messages across the corridor like a digital relay.

  • Solar-powered Raspberry Pi nodes running Meshtastic and Reticulum protocols — up to 10km per hop, extendable by relay.
  • Offline-first Android apps (custom KoboToolbox and Syncthing forks) with local-language interfaces.
  • Community radio integration, linking digital alerts to existing FM broadcast for households without smartphones.
  • Encrypted local servers (mini-NAS) at each node, so nothing reached commercial cloud services without collective consent.

4.2 Partner Selection & Onboarding

Twelve grassroots organisations were selected across the three countries based on established community trust, existing cross-border relationships, and demonstrated capacity for collective decision-making. Priority went to women-led organisations, youth peace committees, and livestock marketing associations already operating transnationally.

A two-week residential orientation covered digital security basics, network governance, conflict-sensitive communication, and node operation. All partners signed a Community Data Sovereignty Compact committing to local control, consent-based sharing, and rejection of extractive data practices.

4.3 Training & Capacity Building

Thirty-two community liaisons (ages 19–34, 70% women) completed intensive training delivered in Kiswahili, Turkana, and Ngakarimojong — combining practical technical skills with political education on digital sovereignty, surveillance, and the colonial history of information extraction in border regions.

  • Device assembly, solar charging maintenance, hardware troubleshooting.
  • Network monitoring: signal strength, node failures, manual message relay.
  • Data governance: sensitivity classification, consent management, encryption basics.
  • Cross-border facilitation: multilingual mediation and neutrality during conflict alerts.
  • Feminist tech principles: centring women’s voices in network governance.

4.4 Technology Deployment

Deployment ran in three phases over 18 months. Phase One established proof-of-concept nodes in four strategically located settlements. Phase Two expanded to twelve nodes, testing interoperability across national boundaries and languages. Phase Three integrated community radio linkages and trained secondary users — elders, livestock traders, women’s group leaders — in basic network access.

Every deployment was accompanied by community assemblies where node locations, access schedules, and data-sharing rules were collectively agreed. No node was installed without visible community consent, and each displayed a public charter of governance principles in local languages.

Section 5

Key Results & Outputs

Tangible Outputs

  • 32 community tech stewards trained in network installation, maintenance, and governance — 70% young women from pastoralist backgrounds.
  • 12 operational network nodes established across the Turkana–Karamoja–South Omo corridor, each solar-powered and locally governed.
  • 40+ cross-border coordination events facilitated, including joint drought response planning, livestock disease containment, and inter-community conflict mediation.
  • A community-authored Cross-Border Tech Governance Framework in Kiswahili, Turkana, and Ngakarimojong, setting protocols for data sharing, consent, node maintenance, and dispute resolution.
  • Three local-language training manuals for mesh network operation, solar maintenance, and digital security, adapted for low-literacy users.
  • Zero data breaches or unauthorized external access incidents throughout the project period, validating the offline-first security model.

Relational & Capacity Outcomes

  • Restored cross-border trust among communities experiencing escalating tensions over resource competition — a neutral, community-owned channel for early warning and mediation perceived as fair by all sides.
  • Shift in gendered technology access. Women tech stewards became recognised authorities on network operations, challenging the male-dominated narrative of who controls technology in frontier regions.
  • Increased confidence in digital sovereignty. Partners reported greater willingness to reject extractive data requests from external actors.
  • Horizontal coordination proved faster. In three separate drought response scenarios, information via the community network reached affected settlements ahead of official government or humanitarian channels.
  • A core cohort of 10 advanced stewards now able to train others and troubleshoot complex issues independently, reducing dependency on Mayhem Threads technical staff.
Section 6

Challenges & Lessons Learned

Six constraints that shaped the project and informed its evolution.

Border politics & state suspicion

National security agencies in all three countries viewed cross-border communication infrastructure with suspicion, and stewards faced questioning by local authorities. Persistent transparency, community vouching, and clear non-political governance charters were essential to maintaining operational space.

Hardware fragility

Temperatures above 40°C, dust storms, and rough transport damaged equipment faster than projected. Solar panels needed weekly cleaning and antennae wind reinforcement. Local repair capacity had to be built from scratch — no commercial tech support existed within 200km of most nodes.

Multilingual complexity

The corridor spans more than six languages and numerous dialects, and machine translation was unavailable offline. Relay between nodes required bilingual stewards, creating bottlenecks during urgent communications. Visual and voice-based interfaces outperformed text-only systems.

Resistance to women’s tech leadership

In some settlements, male elders and youth initially challenged women’s authority as network stewards. Consistent community assembly endorsement, visible technical competence, and the backing of women’s organisations were necessary to establish their legitimacy.

Funding instability

The 18-month timeline was constrained by short-term grant cycles, while community infrastructure requires long-term maintenance commitments that project-based funding cannot guarantee. Sustainability depends on shifting from donor dependency to community resource mobilization and social enterprise.

Interoperability with external systems

Government and humanitarian actors struggled to interface with a network running on open-source protocols outside their proprietary IT systems. Building bridges without compromising community data sovereignty required careful negotiation and technical adaptation.

Key Lesson

Cross-border technology is not primarily a technical challenge — it is a political and relational one. The hardware and software were the easiest parts. Building trust across borders, navigating state suspicion, ensuring women’s leadership, and sustaining community governance required far more time, skill, and patience than any installation manual could anticipate. Technology that works across borders must first be governed by relationships that transcend them.

Section 7

Contribution to Mayhem Threads’ Work

The network fundamentally shaped our organizational identity and strategic direction, establishing the collective as a credible actor in frontier technology infrastructure — moving beyond training and advocacy into the design and deployment of community-governed systems.

  • Institutional expertise in offline-first, cross-border mesh networking now informing all technology partnerships and advisory work.
  • The Community Data Sovereignty Compact adopted as the standard governance template across all Mayhem Threads initiatives.
  • A trained cadre of 32 community tech stewards forming the collective’s first distributed field team.
  • Proof of concept for feminist infrastructure design: where women lead technical governance, adoption rises, security improves, and trust deepens.
  • Strategic clarity on sustainability, prompting exploration of community-owned social enterprise models for network maintenance.
  • Regional visibility among pastoralist networks in Sudan, Somalia, and the Sahel, generating demand for replication support.
Section 8

Looking Ahead

The network established a foundation Mayhem Threads intends to deepen and expand over the coming years. Future priorities include:

  • Network expansion to additional nodes in the broader Karamoja and South Omo clusters, plus exploratory engagement with pastoralist corridors in Sudan and Somalia.
  • Advanced steward training in network engineering, solar system design, and policy advocacy — building a professional cohort of indigenous women infrastructure specialists.
  • Voice-based AI interfaces adapted for local languages and oral-culture communication, reducing dependency on text literacy.
  • Sustainability transition to a community-owned cooperative model funded through livestock marketing fees or collective savings.
  • Policy engagement at East African Community and IGAD levels, advocating recognition of community-governed cross-border digital infrastructure.
  • Replication toolkit development: an open-source guide for frontier communities building their own liaison networks.
Report Spotlight · Liaison Tech Network
“Technology should open borders for communities, not close them for corporations. The frontier is not empty space waiting for external connection, but a place where communities can weave their own digital threads across the lines that divide them.”

— Cross-Border Liaison Tech Network Report, Section 8

Report 02 · Program Report, September 2024

Community-Led Digital Safety Pilot

Digital Literacy & Safety for Refugee Women and Girls in Border Communities
Implemented by Mayhem Threads · With the support of Share-Net International

Download Full Report (PDF)

Pilot at a Glance

Outcomes reflecting both immediate confidence gains and the early signs of a self-sustaining model.

3
Border communities reached
45
Refugee women & girls engaged
70%
Increase in participant confidence
6
New peer facilitators emerged
Executive Summary & Background

Safety Placed in the Hands of Those It Protects

With the support of Share-Net International, Mayhem Threads carried out a community-led digital safety pilot across three border communities, placing digital literacy and online safety directly in the hands of the women and girls it was designed to protect. Rather than a top-down training programme, the pilot relied on peer-to-peer facilitation, equipping participants to recognise and respond to digital threats within their own social networks.

The pilot reached 45 refugee women and girls through peer-led sessions addressing three pressing digital risks: SIM-swap scams, image-based abuse, and misinformation amid a rising tide of fake news. Participants reported a 70% increase in confidence to deal with digital challenges, and six women have since gone on to lead their own sessions.

Border communities present a distinct set of digital safety challenges. Refugee women and girls living in these areas often face limited access to formal digital literacy resources, precarious connectivity, and heightened exposure to exploitation, scams, and misinformation — risks frequently compounded by displacement, language barriers, and unfamiliarity with local digital ecosystems.

Peer-led digital safety session with refugee women and girls
Pilot Design

Design & Methodology

Testing whether a community-led, peer-to-peer model builds more durable digital safety skills than conventional, externally delivered training.

Community-Led, Peer-to-Peer Approach

Rather than relying solely on external facilitators, the program trained and supported women from within the participating communities to lead sessions for their peers — building trust, ensuring cultural and linguistic relevance, and creating a foundation for the knowledge to keep spreading after the pilot’s formal end.

Reach & Selection

The pilot engaged 45 refugee women and girls across three border communities through a series of structured peer-to-peer sessions. Communities were selected for their high concentration of refugee women and girls and their limited prior access to digital safety programming.

Focus Areas

Three digital risks identified as most pressing for participants.

SIM-Swap Scams

How fraudsters hijack phone numbers to gain access to accounts, and the concrete steps participants could take to protect their SIM cards and identities.

Image-Based Abuse

Recognising, preventing, and responding to the non-consensual sharing or exploitation of personal images.

Misinformation

Building the skills to critically evaluate content and navigate a media environment saturated with fake news.

Key Results

Results, Impact & Significance

Confidence Gains

Following the pilot, participants reported a 70% increase in their confidence in dealing with digital challenges — a strong indicator that the peer-led, hands-on format translated into real, felt gains in their ability to identify and respond to threats like SIM-swap scams, image-based abuse, and misinformation.

Emerging Community Leadership

The pilot’s most significant outcome is its multiplier effect: six women from the participating communities have gone on to lead their own digital safety sessions. This organic transition from participant to facilitator suggests the model is not only transferring knowledge but cultivating local leadership and ownership.

Impact & Significance

Digital safety education can be both effective and self-propagating when designed around community leadership rather than one-off external delivery. For refugee women and girls often underserved by mainstream initiatives, this offers a scalable pathway to closing the digital literacy gap while strengthening social cohesion.

Acknowledgements

Mayhem Threads gratefully acknowledges the support of Share-Net International, whose partnership made this pilot possible. Sincere thanks also go to the 45 participants and, in particular, the six emerging peer leaders whose commitment and courage are already extending the impact of this work.

Mayhem Threads report summary poster
Full Documents

Read the Complete Reports

These summaries are drawn from full field reports intended for internal reflection, partner learning, and accountable documentation of community-led work. They do not claim to represent the full diversity of the pastoralist, nomadic, stateless or refugee communities involved, nor do they replace ongoing community governance of the programs themselves.